|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD
 
On 08/18/2011 01:04 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
 
>  0x95400 - 0x90000 = 0x5400 = 21KBytes.
>
>  21Kbytes is enough for gen.gz running(hypervisor) ?
 
 
 
 The trampoline is even smaller than 21K.  The problem is that the stack 
(at 0x98000) is overlapping the EBDA.
 I suggest that you open a support case with Red Hat.  We do plan to make 
this change, but the process is much easier if we have an open ticket 
that requests it.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, (continued)
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 - Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 - Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD,
Paolo Bonzini <=
 - [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 - [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 - [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, BobZhang
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |