|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD
On 08/18/2011 01:04 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> 0x95400 - 0x90000 = 0x5400 = 21KBytes.
>
> 21Kbytes is enough for gen.gz running(hypervisor) ?
The trampoline is even smaller than 21K. The problem is that the stack
(at 0x98000) is overlapping the EBDA.
I suggest that you open a support case with Red Hat. We do plan to make
this change, but the process is much easier if we have an open ticket
that requests it.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, BobZhang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD, Lin-Bao Zhang
|
|
|
|
|