WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

from [Ian Jackson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:35:41 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 09:37:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CA65C0BB.1EEA0%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20031.64236.828705.677433@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA65C0BB.1EEA0%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - 
PUSHED"):
> On 08/08/2011 16:04, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It fails on
> >   leaf-beetle, potato-beetle, woodlouse      All of which are AMD machines
> 
> Can you set up a bisection run on one of the AMD boxes?

I think I have one running.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED, Keir Fraser
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] Block front and back connection, Pasi Kärkkäinen
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED, Keir Fraser
Next by Thread:  [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 8290: regressions - FAIL, xen . org
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy