xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen)
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen) |
From: |
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Aug 2011 09:01:07 -0400 |
Cc: |
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Linus, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 08 Aug 2011 06:02:04 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<4E3D8657.7000704@xxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<20110725162542.39ea8d8cbd51604523635c1a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110725144629.b752bf14.rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110804193534.GB12729@xxxxxxx> <20110804195539.GA11198@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110804131516.c4da6595.rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110804223259.GB4370@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110804224020.GA21492@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E3B3117.5050308@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110805080531.GA8052@xxxxxxx> <20110805211423.GA9765@xxxxxxx> <20110806015815.GA26833@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E3D8657.7000704@xxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 11:22 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 08/05/2011 06:58 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:14:23PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> * Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 08/04/11 15:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:32:59PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> These build failures are still triggering upstream:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:44:2: error: array index in initializer not
> >>>>>>>>> of integer type
> >>>>>>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:44:2: error: (near initialization for
> >>>>>>>>> ‘xen_hypercall_names’)
> >>>>>>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:1: error: ‘__HYPERVISOR_arch_4’ undeclared
> >>>>>>>>> here (not in a function)
> >>>>>>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:2: error: array index in initializer not
> >>>>>>>>> of integer type
> >>>>>>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:2: error: (near initialization for
> >>>>>>>>> ‘xen_hypercall_names’)
> >>>>>>>> Oh, that I haven't seen. Can you send me the .config for that please.
> >>>>>>> You can't be trying very hard then. I see lots of these (but no,
> >>>>>> Ah, I am getting it now. Thanks for reporting it.
> >>>>> This should do the trick:
> >>>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> That patch did the trick here too:
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> >> Except that i'm still seeing the occasional build failure - see the
> >> error log below. Config attached.
> > Much appreciate for the report. I believe this fix (which I think hit
> > linux-next yesterday?) should do that:
> >
> > commit 1e9ea2656b656edd3c8de98675bbc0340211b5bd
> > Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed Aug 3 09:43:44 2011 -0700
> >
> > xen/tracing: it looks like we wanted CONFIG_FTRACE
> >
> > Apparently we wanted CONFIG_FTRACE rather the CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER.
> >
> > Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> > index 45e94ac..3326204 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ obj-y := enlighten.o setup.o multicalls.o
> > mmu.o irq.o \
> > grant-table.o suspend.o platform-pci-unplug.o \
> > p2m.o
> >
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER) += trace.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_FTRACE) += trace.o
> >
>
> I'm not sure this is correct either. Maybe it should be
> CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS? Steven?
Actually, I believe the correct answer is:
CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING
-- Steve
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Randy Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Randy Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Randy Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Stephen Rothwell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen),
Steven Rostedt <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|