[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH, v2] libxl: sane disk backend selection a

To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH, v2] libxl: sane disk backend selection and validation
From:	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:45:08 +0100
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:46:00 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1311166306.20648.192.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<19988.31275.221429.48662@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1309967359.634.183.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19988.34830.646646.818359@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1311166306.20648.192.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH, v2] libxl: sane disk backend selection and 
validation"):
> I just noticed this, and out of curiosity rather than thinking it should
> change, is there a reason to avoid returning enum types for functions?

No.  I think in this case it's just a mistake.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH, v2] libxl: sane disk backend selection and validation, Ian Jackson <=

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH, v2] libxl: sane disk backend selection and valid