WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 8093: regressions - trouble: broken/f

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 8093: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
From: xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 05:39:01 +0100
Cc: ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:40:12 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
flight 8093 xen-4.0-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8093/

Regressions :-(

Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
 test-amd64-i386-pv            6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-i386-i386-pv             6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-amd64-pv           6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8015
 test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu  6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-amd64-pair     10 leak-check/basis/dst_host(10) fail REGR. vs. 8015
 test-amd64-amd64-pair       9 leak-check/basis/src_host(9) fail REGR. vs. 8015
 test-i386-i386-xl             6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-i386-xl            6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-amd64-xl           6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8015
 test-i386-i386-win            6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-amd64-win          6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8015
 test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel  6 leak-check/basis(6)      fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-i386-i386-pair         9 leak-check/basis/src_host(9) fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-i386-i386-pair       10 leak-check/basis/dst_host(10) fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-i386-pair        9 leak-check/basis/src_host(9) fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-i386-pair      10 leak-check/basis/dst_host(10) fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd  6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1    6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-i386-win           6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1  6 leak-check/basis(6)       fail REGR. vs. 8010
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-win       6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8015
 test-i386-i386-xl-win         6 leak-check/basis(6)        fail REGR. vs. 8010

Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking,
including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable:
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel  6 leak-check/basis(6)         fail never pass
 test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2    5 xen-boot                     fail    like 8015

version targeted for testing:
 xen                  89608751ccfc
baseline version:
 xen                  a353b8304f7a

------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
  David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
  Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
  Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
  Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
------------------------------------------------------------

jobs:
 build-amd64                                                  pass    
 build-i386                                                   pass    
 build-amd64-oldkern                                          pass    
 build-i386-oldkern                                           pass    
 build-amd64-pvops                                            pass    
 build-i386-pvops                                             pass    
 test-amd64-amd64-xl                                          broken  
 test-amd64-i386-xl                                           broken  
 test-i386-i386-xl                                            broken  
 test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd                                 broken  
 test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2                                   fail    
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel                              broken  
 test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel                               broken  
 test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu                                 broken  
 test-amd64-amd64-pair                                        broken  
 test-amd64-i386-pair                                         broken  
 test-i386-i386-pair                                          broken  
 test-amd64-amd64-pv                                          broken  
 test-amd64-i386-pv                                           broken  
 test-i386-i386-pv                                            broken  
 test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1                                   broken  
 test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1                                broken  
 test-amd64-amd64-win                                         broken  
 test-amd64-i386-win                                          broken  
 test-i386-i386-win                                           broken  
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-win                                      broken  
 test-i386-i386-xl-win                                        broken  


------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images

Logs, config files, etc. are available at
    http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs

Test harness code can be found at
    http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary


Not pushing.

------------------------------------------------------------
changeset:   21521:89608751ccfc
tag:         tip
user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
date:        Sat Jul 16 09:35:13 2011 +0100
    
    x86: fix guest migration after c/s 20892:d311d1efc25e
    
    Guests would not manage to run successfully after being migrated to a
    host having sufficiently much more memory than the host they were
    originally started on.
    
    Subsequently the plan is to re-enable the changes behavior under the
    control of a guest kernel announced feature flag.
    
    Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
    xen-unstable changeset:   23706:3dd399873c9e
    xen-unstable date:        Sat Jul 16 09:18:21 2011 +0100
    
    
changeset:   21520:fd9e72e1b1c3
user:        David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
date:        Sat Jul 16 09:34:57 2011 +0100
    
    xen/libxc: set CPUID topology leaf as unsupported for PV guests
    
    The result of a CPUID Extended Topology Enumeration leaf for PV guests
    is invalid as the level in ECX is ignored.  This can cause some guests
    to loop endlessly when trying to enumerate the topology.
    
    Since the physical topology isn't useful to PV guests set the topology
    leaf as unsupported.
    
    Guests affected include Linux kernels prior 2.6.32 where a workaround
    was applied ("xen: mask extended topology info in cpu",
    82d6469916c6fcfa345636a49004c9d1753905d1).
    
    Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
    xen-unstable changeset:   23700:867bb675b57b
    xen-unstable date:        Sat Jul 16 09:05:45 2011 +0100
    
    
changeset:   21519:a353b8304f7a
user:        Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
date:        Fri Jul 08 09:02:03 2011 +0100
    
    x86/hvm: Don't expose CPUID time leaf when not using PVRDTSCP
    
    Some versions of Oracle's Solaris PV drivers make a check that the
    maximal Xen hypervisor CPUID leaf is <= base leaf + 2 and refuse to
    work if this is not the case.  The addition of the time leaf makes the
    maximal leaf == base leaf + 3 so this patch introduces a workaround
    that obscures the time leaf unless PVRDTSCP is in operation.
    
    Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
    xen-unstable changeset:   23661:8fe6f4be18aa
    xen-unstable date:        Fri Jul 08 08:31:10 2011 +0100
    
    
(qemu changes not included)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 8093: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass, xen . org <=