WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability exposure

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and capability exposure
From: Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden <groen692@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:12:25 +0200
Cc:
Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:13:24 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110704085810.GZ17634@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <patchbomb.1307607905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <480cfcea095bddb2e7c4.1307607925@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110613082700.GA17634@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B2562BF1EC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110615124527.GG17634@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DFEE946.9070603@xxxxxxxxx> <4E0C84C8.1030804@xxxxxxxxx> <20110701090145.GS9784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E0D9948.5000508@xxxxxxx> <4E0D9D48.20308@xxxxxxxxx> <20110704085810.GZ17634@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
Eddie, did I mention I'm eager and capable of testing anything you need.

mfg,
jeroen

Op 4-7-2011 10:58, Tim Deegan schreef:
At 12:11 +0200 on 01 Jul (1309522280), Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden wrote:
Just a remark to avoid misunderstanding

The first nested  KVM guest is running ok, for as long as i keep it running
When starting a second nested KVM guest (in the same Xen DOMU) that
is when the Xen DOMU becomes in-responsive. In DOM0 it it shown that
it is still running and consuming time.


The complete test is like this

dom0
opensuse 11.4 x86
xen: unstable cs 23640
You're testing on Intel hardware, right?

Eddie, any comment?

Tim.

domu1 (HVM)
sles11sp1
mem: 8 GB
vcpu: 4

domu1 guests
1) qemu-kvm: propetary OS
2) qemu-kvm: propetary OS
3) qemu-kvm: SLES10SP3
4) qemu-kvm: SLES10SP3

mfg,
Jeroen

Op 1-7-2011 11:54, Christoph Egger schreef:
KVM on Xen works for me. Also KVM on Xen on Xen.

Christoph


On 07/01/11 11:01, Tim Deegan wrote:
Eddie?  Did you test with KVM guests?  Is this expected to work?

Tim.

At 15:14 +0100 on 30 Jun (1309446872), Jeroen Groenewegen van
der Weyden wrote:
Hi Tim/Eddi/Christoph,

I just gave it a go again with cs23640. But the behaviour is still the
same. so L1 becomes inresponsive after starting the second
nested quest.
I can deliver any trace input you want/need.

mfg,
Jeroen.

Op 20-6-2011 8:31, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden schreef:
Hi,

Based on these patch series, I gave it go.
I noticed until now that the system becomes in-responsive a few second
after activating the second nested guest.
steps:
1) dom0 creates domu (pass)
2) domU creates first kvm guest (pass)
3) domU creates second kvm guest (fail)
after the third step the domu becomes in-responsive. eg no network /
vnc console response. in dom0 is shows domu is stil running.

I'm able to provide any input needed, just tell me what you need (and
how).

mfg,
Jeroen

My HW setup
mobo asus z8nr-d12
proc: 2 times e5645
mem: 96 GB

My goal/test
in short: HW ->   dom0 ->   domU ->   4 time kvm guest

dom0
opensuse 11.4 x86
xen: unstable cs 23553

domu (HVM)
sles11sp1
mem: 8 GB
vcpu: 4

domu guests
1) qemu-kvm: propetary OS
2) qemu-kvm: propetary OS
3) qemu-kvm: SLES10SP3
4) qemu-kvm: SLES10SP3



Op 15-6-2011 14:45, Tim Deegan schreef:
At 10:29 +0800 on 14 Jun (1308047377), Dong, Eddie wrote:
+    case MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC:
+    case MSR_IA32_VMX_CR0_FIXED0:
+    case MSR_IA32_VMX_CR0_FIXED1:
+    case MSR_IA32_VMX_CR4_FIXED0:
+    case MSR_IA32_VMX_CR4_FIXED1:
+    case MSR_IA32_VMX_VMCS_ENUM:
+        gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "VMX MSR %x not fully supported
yet.\n", msr);

Are you planning to fix this before checking in this series?  I'm
pretty
sure that at least MSR_IA32_VMX_VMCS_ENUM should be
trivial, since you
define your own VMCS format.

Sure, the updated patch is attached.
Thanks.  I've applied the full series.  I cleaned up a few things for
the 32-bit build as well.

Cheers,

Tim.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>