 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Solaris and PVRDTSCP
| To: | Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Solaris and PVRDTSCP |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 01 Jul 2011 19:04:16 +0100 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:06:28 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rdbYxOwS7gc3xEJb5WXmxxcHwhUxVqf2go6z/9PBxYI=; b=eI+UED9DWWGAoNlzVdXFWctAtfZEadPuW6XZfDqyN13Ju62h0i8nCissrk3eDqBXL/ ZbLQSXDFxEUattte+ipZLaKMc5+qWRiciULZMrBdPxZG/IZefuzmEcaMa839dgYdhnHU 0XrixGxFLo49guZVdDyM+9zu2pjmgv3mtKfLs= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <512de115-3a6b-4957-8a6d-93dc724503eb@default> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Acw4GUpfiBeThPO/4kaVQshZwlq8HA== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] RE: Solaris and PVRDTSCP |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.29.0.110113 |
On 01/07/2011 18:51, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Clearly future versions of the Solaris kernel should revise this check but >> to allow this kernel to >> enable PV drivers I was wondering what sort of workaround could be done. My >> current thoughts are along >> the lines of disabling the extra CPUID leaf if tsc_mode is < >> TSC_MODE_PVRDTSCP. > > This seems reasonable. The info on that leaf could be useful in other > modes, but likely hasn't been. Tbh I'm fine with this as well, on the understanding that it may end up having to be fixed the hard way (explicit max_leaf) if we add anything more to the hypervisor cpuid space. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86: cpuid faulting feature enable, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (4.0.1 w/2.6.32.36), Daniel Stodden |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] RE: Solaris and PVRDTSCP, Dan Magenheimer |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Solaris and PVRDTSCP, Paul Durrant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
