| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen/blkback: Don't let in-flight requests defer
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 10:03 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > In the case at hand, increasing the ring size was way more productive.
> > At which point the queue depth multiplies as well. And I currently
> > expect that the longer it gets the more urgent the issue you describe
> > will be.
>
> You wouldn't have patches for that somewhere tucked away? I am going over
> the patches for 3.1 xen-blkback and was thinking to have them all queued up
> and
> test them all at once..
I was going to send the kernel patch right after, just to discover that
xen-blkback lacks some of the synchronization items the original one was
based on. It's coming, but it's rather going to be a series.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home