This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] v2: Nested-p2m cleanups and locking chang

At 14:15 +0100 on 27 Jun (1309184128), Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 14:23 +0200 on 27 Jun (1309184586), Christoph Egger wrote:
> > >  - Why is there a 10x increase in IPIs after this series?  I don't see
> > >    what sequence of events sets the relevant cpumask bits to make this
> > >    happen.
> > 
> > In patch 1 the code that sends the IPIs was outside of the loop and
> > moved into the loop.
> Well, yes, but I don't see what that causes 10x IPIs, unless the vcpus
> are burning through np2m tables very quickly indeed.  Maybe removing the
> extra flushes for TLB control will do the trick.  I'll make a patch...

Hmmm, on second thoughts, we can't remove those flushes after all. 
The np2m is in sync with the p2m but not with the guest-supplied p2m, 
so we do need to flush it when the guest asks for that to happen.


Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>