Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v3] replace d->nr_pirqs sized arrays wit

>>> On 21.06.11 at 16:28, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 21/06/2011 08:51, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> With this it is questionable whether retaining struct domain's nr_pirqs
>> is actually necessary - the value now only serves for bounds checking,
>> and this boundary could easily be nr_irqs.
>> 
>> Note that ia64, the build of which is broken currently anyway, is only
>> being partially fixed up.
>> 
>> v2: adjustments for split setup/teardown of translation data
>> 
>> v3: re-sync with radix tree implementation changes
> 
> What is the reason for rcu-head.h?

Header dependency mess (need to have the full type definition
available in xen/irq.h).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH, v3] replace d->nr_pirqs sized arrays with radix tree, Jan Beulich Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v3] replace d->nr_pirqs sized arrays with radix tree, Keir Fraser Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v3] replace d->nr_pirqs sized arrays with radix tree, Jan Beulich <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Domains not being destroyed properly, Anthony Wright

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] libxl, Introduce a QMP client, Ian Jackson

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v3] replace d->nr_pirqs sized arrays with radix tree, Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: allow building without O_CLOEXEC definition, Jan Beulich

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]