WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] apic probe of 2.6.32.41 pv linux

To: Jiageng Yu <yujiageng734@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] apic probe of 2.6.32.41 pv linux
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 11:24:10 -0400
Cc: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 May 2011 20:07:43 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BANLkTinydmZz5z+oiJGdjMDOtAd87Ooh2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BANLkTimUY4cLyZeff=N4tRU+1c3=KimTSw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110527135756.GB6734@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTinydmZz5z+oiJGdjMDOtAd87Ooh2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:44:05PM +0800, Jiageng Yu wrote:
> 2011/5/27 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 05:58:51PM +0800, Jiageng Yu wrote:
> >> I have updated the pv linux kernel from 2.6.32.40 to 2.6.32.41. I
> >> found the generic_apic_probe always led to a kernel panic when I try
> >> to make the minimal DomU kernel.
> >>
> >> The 2.6.32.41 pv linux use the new apic probe mechanism:
> >
> > new..? What was it before?
> 
> 
> The linux kernel will invoke probe_default, which permanently returns 1.
> I wander to know may I just return 1 in 2.6.32.41 kernel? If there is
> no further problems.

Can't you just look in the git history to check for this?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>