| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.39 dom0 xen power management test
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:57:47PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Konrad / Yu Ke,
>
> I have tried konrad's master tree:
Might want to try devel/next-2.6.39. It has the CPU freq and S3 patches in it.
I am still working through them, but they do seem to work (I can suspend
and resume a machine).
The #master has the ones that have been cleaned up and are slowly going
to make their path through the maintainers. The ACPI/S#/CPU freq aren't there
yet.
>
> commit 329408d788f62629131ea28c112e973878d52c9e
> Merge: e370fe2 773f8cf
> Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu May 19 14:37:32 2011 -0400
>
> Merge branch 'linux-next'
>
>
> With a xen-4.1.0 hypervisor, on my AMD x6 phenom.
> Curious if Xen Power Management would work...
>
> Output of all xenpm get* commands is attached, prefix 32 is with a stable
> working 2.6.32.35 kernel from jeremy's tree with working xenpm.
> prefix 39 is with the kernel from the tree mentoined above.
>
> There are differences in cpu-idle-states (C0 and C1 state are not reported
> on .39)
> and cpu-freq-states/para (which fails entirely on .39)
>
> But it doesn't crash .. just fails .. so that's positive ! :-)
HA!
> Of course i'm willing to give any more information or test additional patches.
>
>
> Will let it run for the night on 2.6.39 to see how blkback works !
Excellent.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home