On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:27:05AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 05/15/2011 08:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >> Friday, May 13, 2011, 6:49:27 PM, you wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:46:18AM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
> >>>> Great work everyone. :)
> >>> Combined with this week acceptance of Xen in upstream QEMU, and I think
> >>> that the majority of folks on xen-devel are going to have a hard hangover
> >>> on Monday :-)
> >> Cheers and thx all ! :-)
> >>>> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major
> >>>> milestone to be pushed upstream?
> >>> There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is
> >>> important
> >>> since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.
> >> A semi one for me personally would be acpi-processor stuff to make xenpm
> >> work.
> >> But having blkback would make it at least ok to test for some longer
> >> period :-)
> > At Xen Hack-a-tron two months ago Jeremy was mentioning pvops acpi patches..
> > Jeremy: Any plans for submitting those upstream?
> Konrad has a set of acpi patches from the Virtual Computer folks I think.
<nods> In process of creating a branch of them.
Xen-users mailing list