WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] full featured, fully bug-fix pv-ops branch?

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] full featured, fully bug-fix pv-ops branch?
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 16:07:40 +0300
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 09 May 2011 06:08:46 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4DC7F72B020000780004064E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4DC7F72B020000780004064E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:16:11PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Jeremy, Konrad,
> 
> stumbling over this once in a while (this time looking for where Dominic's
> "blktap: Fix reference to freed struct request" patch ended up, without
> any success so far) I wonder what pv-ops branch(es) is (are) supposed
> to be the one(s) (e.g.) distros ought to use - that is, fully featured (at
> least as far as non-experimental features go) *and* fully bug-fixed.
> 
> The branches XenParavirtOps on the wiki points to don't seem to be the
> ones (some of them seem not to have a blktap implementation at all),
> and gathering bits from various people's private trees can't be the
> ultimate solution...
> 

Afaik Jeremy's xen.git xen/stable-2.6.32.x is supposed to be the
long-term stable branch, following upstream kernel.org long-term branch.

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>