Re: [Xen-devel] Upstream QEMU not working with Xen unstable, lac

To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Upstream QEMU not working with Xen unstable, lacks option definitions
From:	Wei Liu <liuw@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 6 May 2011 16:47:05 +0800
Cc:	Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Fri, 06 May 2011 01:48:15 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1304671227.26692.116.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<BANLkTi=SkvbisRmUfrvCdyjKZ+zbRAAHfA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1304585250.26692.69.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTi=0yeAB=cTx2sRDaZmB9=YpnYSNiQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1304590398.26692.77.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTin0F3Jj1_aKuF+w4wh4ng4S4e=bow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1304668489.26692.106.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTi=w0iyLm4FUWYmC4i609T3ow9ttTA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1304671227.26692.116.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Ian Campbell
<Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:>
> Oh, yes, I use the following local patch and had forgotten about it, not
> sure how upstreamable it is, perhaps we might need to get libxl to query
> this via QMP and write the result itself or something.
>
> Ian.

Thanks for your patch.

I just find out that nographic=1 is not working, either. Seems that
lots of work has to be done here.

-- 
Best regards
Wei Liu
Twitter: @iliuw
Site: http://liuw.name

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Proposal: vif-local, Ian Campbell

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 6996: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED, xen . org

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Upstream QEMU not working with Xen unstable, lacks option definitions, Ian Campbell

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Upstream QEMU not working with Xen unstable, lacks option definitions, Stefano Stabellini

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Upstream QEMU not working with Xen unstable, lacks optio