 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] FPU LWP 5/8: add a mask option to xsave() and xr
>>> On 04.05.11 at 18:03, Wei Huang <wei.huang2@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jan, > > That is a good point. So far there isn't a way to decide which bits are > guarded by CR0.TS. I will bring it up to our design team. I guess LWP > will the only exception for a long while. Is the first approach > sufficient/acceptable to you for now? > > #define XSTATE_LAZY (XSTATE_ALL & ~XSTATE_NONLAZY) Yes. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] irq: Exclude percpu IRQs from being fixed up, Tian, Kevin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] FPU LWP 6/8: create lazy and non-lazy FPU restore functions, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] FPU LWP 5/8: add a mask option to xsave() and xrstor(), Wei Huang |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] FPU LWP 6/8: create lazy and non-lazy FPU restore functions, Wei Huang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
