WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 6979: trouble: blocked/broken/pass

To: <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 6979: trouble: blocked/broken/pass
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 09:07:06 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 03 May 2011 01:09:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <osstest-6979-mainreport@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <osstest-6979-mainreport@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This one was still testing 23296:24346f749826 despite saying it would
be using 10f27b8b3d63. I'm getting increasingly confused.

Jan

>>> On 03.05.11 at 04:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 6979 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/6979/ 
> 
> Failures and problems with tests :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
>  build-amd64-oldkern           2 host-install(2)              broken
>  build-amd64                   2 host-install(2)              broken
>  build-i386-oldkern            2 host-install(2)              broken
>  build-i386-pvops              2 host-install(2)              broken
>  build-i386-xcpkern            2 host-install(2)              broken
>  build-i386                    2 host-install(2)              broken
> 
> Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking,
> including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable:
>  test-amd64-amd64-pair         1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-amd64-pv           1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-amd64-win          1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win       1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl           1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-pair          1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-pv            1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd  1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel  1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1    1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-win           1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2    1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu  1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1  1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-i386-xl            1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair  1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pv    1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd  1 xen-build-check(1)         blocked 
> n/a
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel  1 xen-build-check(1)       blocked 
> n/a
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win   1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2  1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked 
> n/a
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-multivcpu  1 xen-build-check(1)         blocked 
> n/a
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win  1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl    1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-i386-i386-pair           1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-i386-i386-pv             1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-i386-i386-win            1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-i386-i386-xl-win         1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-i386-i386-xl             1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair   1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pv     1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win    1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-xl     1 xen-build-check(1)           blocked  n/a
> 
> version targeted for testing:
>  xen                  10f27b8b3d63
> baseline version:
>  xen                  476b0d68e7d5
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> People who touched revisions under test:
>   Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>   Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>   Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> jobs:
>  build-i386-xcpkern                                           broken   
>  build-amd64                                                  broken   
>  build-i386                                                   broken   
>  build-amd64-oldkern                                          broken   
>  build-i386-oldkern                                           broken   
>  build-amd64-pvops                                            pass     
>  build-i386-pvops                                             broken   
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl                                          blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-xl                                           blocked  
>  test-i386-i386-xl                                            blocked  
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl                                   blocked  
>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-xl                                    blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd                                 blocked  
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd                         blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2                                   blocked  
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2                           blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel                               blocked  
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel                       blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu                                 blocked  
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-multivcpu                         blocked  
>  test-amd64-amd64-pair                                        blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-pair                                         blocked  
>  test-i386-i386-pair                                          blocked  
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair                                 blocked  
>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair                                  blocked  
>  test-amd64-amd64-pv                                          blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-pv                                           blocked  
>  test-i386-i386-pv                                            blocked  
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pv                                   blocked  
>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pv                                    blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1                                   blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1                                blocked  
>  test-amd64-amd64-win                                         blocked  
>  test-amd64-i386-win                                          blocked  
>  test-i386-i386-win                                           blocked  
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win                                  blocked  
>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win                                   blocked  
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win                                      blocked  
>  test-i386-i386-xl-win                                        blocked  
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win                               blocked  
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
> logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
> images: /home/xc_osstest/images
> 
> Logs, config files, etc. are available at
>     http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs 
> 
> Test harness code can be found at
>     http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary 
> 
> 
> Not pushing.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> changeset:   23297:10f27b8b3d63
> tag:         tip
> user:        Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> date:        Mon May 02 12:00:40 2011 +0100
>     
>     Revert 23295:4891f1f41ba5 and 23296:24346f749826
>     
>     Fails current lock checking mechanism in spinlock.c in debug=y builds.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23296:24346f749826
> user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 13:17:44 2011 +0100
>     
>     replace d->nr_pirqs sized arrays with radix tree
>     
>     With this it is questionable whether retaining struct domain's
>     nr_pirqs is actually necessary - the value now only serves for bounds
>     checking, and this boundary could easily be nr_irqs.
>     
>     Another thing to consider is whether it's worth storing the pirq
>     number in struct pirq, to avoid passing the number and a pointer to
>     quite a number of functions.
>     
>     Note that ia64, the build of which is broken currently anyway, is only
>     partially fixed up.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23295:4891f1f41ba5
> user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 13:16:30 2011 +0100
>     
>     x86: replace nr_irqs sized per-domain arrays with radix trees
>     
>     It would seem possible to fold the two trees into one (making e.g. the
>     emuirq bits stored in the upper half of the pointer), but I'm not
>     certain that's worth it as it would make deletion of entries more
>     cumbersome. Unless pirq-s and emuirq-s were mutually exclusive...
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23294:c0a8f889ca9e
> user:        Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 13:03:37 2011 +0100
>     
>     public/arch-ia64/debug_op.h: Reinsert copyright that I accidentally 
> deleted.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23293:f48c72de4208
> user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 10:20:44 2011 +0100
>     
>     x86: a little bit of cleanup to time.c
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23292:e2fb962d13ff
> user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 10:16:54 2011 +0100
>     
>     x86: clean up building in mm/hap/
>     
>     Building 4-level guest walks is unnecessary for x86-32, and with this
>     no longer being built the fallback code used here isn't necessary
>     anymore either.
>     
>     Additonally the mechanism to determine the value of
>     GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS to be passed to the compiler can be much
>     simplified given that we're using a pattern rule here.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23291:485b7c5e6f17
> user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 10:15:11 2011 +0100
>     
>     A little bit of SMP boot code cleanup
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23290:1ac7336b6298
> user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 10:14:15 2011 +0100
>     
>     x86: set ARAT feature flag for non-buggy AMD CPUs
>     
>     This is the equivalent of a recent Linux change.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23289:e4fc9494b940
> user:        Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 10:11:58 2011 +0100
>     
>     mini-os: fix lib.h licence
>     
>     Update the Linux stdio functions prototypes, and move them to a
>     separate header, licenced under GPL2+.  Import FreeBSD8 string
>     functions prototypes, update licence.  Drop kvec, of unsure source and
>     useless anyway.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23288:60dfb5aca706
> user:        Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 10:10:12 2011 +0100
>     
>     mini-os: lib/math.c: import FreeBSD 8 functions
>     
>     Import lib/math.c functions (and thus licence) from FreeBSD 8,
>     and re-apply a few of our changes. Whitespaces left aside, this
>     leads to almost no source change except s/int64_t/quad_t/ and
>     s/uint64_t/u_quad_t/.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23287:bf11f502684a
> user:        Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 10:09:47 2011 +0100
>     
>     mini-os: Fix printf.c licence
>     
>     Changeset df1348e72390 actually completely replaced the freebsd printf
>     implementation with the Linux printf implementation. Further changes
>     are extremely minor and thus don't pose IP issue. Fix the licence
>     accordingly.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23286:6f48f5f843f0
> user:        Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 10:08:40 2011 +0100
>     
>     Clean up licensing in the public header directory.
>     
>     The COPYING file at xen/include/public/COPYING clearly states that all
>     public header files are distributed under a permissive MIT
>     license. Therefore make sure the same permissive license is included
>     at the top of every header file (i.e., not GPL).
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23285:a7ac0a0170b0
> user:        Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> date:        Sun May 01 09:32:48 2011 +0100
>     
>     x86: Clean up smp_call_function handling.
>     
>     We don't need so many communication fields between caller and
>     handler.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> changeset:   23284:476b0d68e7d5
> user:        Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> date:        Sat Apr 30 09:48:16 2011 +0100
>     
>     x86: Remove TRAP_INSTR from the public headers.
>     
>     Direct hypercall traps (rather than using the hypercall transfer page)
>     was long obsolete even when TRAP_INSTR was deprecated in the API
>     headers. No current guest will be, or should be, using TRAP_INSTR.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>     
>     
> (qemu changes not included)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>