xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions
To: |
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions |
From: |
John Weekes <lists.xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 02 May 2011 20:39:50 -0700 |
Cc: |
"mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx" <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Wang, Winston L" <winston.l.wang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 02 May 2011 20:41:36 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F1505C885A8F4B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<4DBE41C9.1010409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C9E41092.170DB%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> <4DBE7819020000780003F1B6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DBEEF6D.8080204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110502181222.GB7498@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DBEFB6E.4090201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DBF0306.8040000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F1505C885A8F4B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 5/2/2011 8:04 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
you won't know the exact frequency bumped up in the turbo mode, as it's all
handled
by the CPU itself. what xen can do is just to tell the cpu now I'm OK to enter
turbo
mode, which is 2268000 (1M higher than normal P0). Then CPU will decide whether
current code can be overclocked based on various conditions, such as TDP, other
core activities in the same package, ...
One possibility to verify that turbo mode does work is to run a CPU intensive
workload
on one core, while keeping other cores mostly idle. Then choose cpufreq governor
to be performance, and then compare your benchmark when BIOS turbo mode is
on/off. This should give you some feeling whether turbo mode works on your
platform.
Thanks for the response, Kevin.
It's good to know that I can check turbo by looking to see if it's in
the 1000hz-higher mode. It's a little strange to me that the true MHz
level of the turbo wouldn't be known/shown, but I can live with that, as
the actual performance is what counts. I'll run those benches.
-John
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, John Weekes
- Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, John Weekes
- Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, John Weekes
- Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, John Weekes
- RE: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions,
John Weekes <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, Tian, Kevin
- Message not available
- Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions, Jan Beulich
|
|
|