WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Performance difference between Xen versions
From: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:23:56 +0200
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 02 May 2011 01:24:40 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ts.fujitsu.com; i=juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; q=dns/txt; s=s1536b; t=1304324639; x=1335860639; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hTnFkMzT+ExCbVA/kPC8zcRGq/1DI0IgGT4ZvKGneP8=; b=b0NHoclw+Z3vBN/6KEugwE2DadO/4V+hwO/fpTOOdeefqzOl6bXnRzW9 OYetsCfPrzquosDeoCOXKC4vvJQVUqsmFPTEwNixjyo/dTXOk5UTItef+ vy033lekbGMnggY+RJMuX/lOd7Pz05n40yernqBmrcdV4lqsLiV6HFoIc +B/07BtQ3VMLbbly1aArCSXuTe6F7D9Ji0L1l/ZcgHqkaBwr7ow0Kn3Pp /N1jZGGLrZTIDO+FEcCZZsDQzYHL+;
Domainkey-signature: s=s1536a; d=ts.fujitsu.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-SBRSScore:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-IronPort-AV: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization: User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YhPiZQXFdSAhf6aON8Fl0nB8dwtCrLU8c4wLsjXPEm8Atw6gFcOW6eet XgiXqfKOm/KZG6BuR4Gn7hXC8je9YbWTkQpmKGT8NxZrjRElEH8OWOpsS DZOPG///7OxF/cYGv7RHgZki3vySa1YH3V922mQU3gXCNkzjrHC6Tgfp5 dEe05IwFFjOimTww406BLSg3DGD1qL7GhujcFZlUpo+ZwGa59G516Eh15 CjsUSpFokVfA5zJiQ//cPzAOaJuCv;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4DBE8433020000780003F1DF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Fujitsu Technology Solutions
References: <4DBE41C9.1010409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C9E41092.170DB%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> <4DBE7819020000780003F1B6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DBE64A6.2080602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DBE8433020000780003F1DF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110402 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.9
On 05/02/11 10:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.05.11 at 10:00, Juergen Gross<juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On the long run I'd like to make the cpufreq governor a feature of the
cpupool. This would enable an administrator of a large Xen machine
with a heterogeneous load to specify which domains should run at
full speed and which are allowed to save energy at the cost of latency.

What do you think?
Certainly an interesting idea, with the question of how an implementation
of this would look like.

Let me do some research work first :-)
I hope to make a proposal soon.


Juergen

--
Juergen Gross                 Principal Developer Operating Systems
TSP ES&S SWE OS6                       Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967
Fujitsu Technology Solutions              e-mail: juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Domagkstr. 28                           Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-80807 Muenchen                 Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel