This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Nested Virtualisation question

To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Nested Virtualisation question
From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:29:13 +0100
Cc: "Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden <groen692@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:30:08 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C9C322FD.15F81%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C9C321CC.15F6F%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> <C9C322FD.15F81%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
At 08:14 +0100 on 07 Apr (1302164093), Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 08:09, "Keir Fraser" <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Probably the same as this, happening often in the automated tests:
> Likely reason: nestedhvm_vcpu_initialise() being called unconditionally in
> hvm_vcpu_initialise() even though nestedhvm has not been configured for this
> domain. This then fails because there is no nestedhvm handler for Intel yet.

This bug should be fixed by 23175:e5a750d1bf9b, arriving at a staging
tree near you at any moment. 

> And beyond that it's most likely an issue of a broken failure path, or a
> problem in the HAP code with cleaning up a half-created guest.

This one I'll look into now.


Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>