This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Nested Virtualization: tools

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Nested Virtualization: tools
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:26:16 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 03:27:26 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KjzqT2BAn5Av7aribYQOpEo9iE4F4gy4glhGNfLjAxo=; b=Y3kGyMlWkzYn26lxg/h2S2DJXg/ScKEKWQ7zmaYFU8Nm0NjC2XgT2MasIsee9WDIpm YsvSlqNYGpPcYWjh97O5PZqyt9oaMrUMQnEamSt9WYdl6qXytHdcE3H6kGCJ+bVH3D1j 8SoW4t0g+A8P1WYWvtAg9X/8v7zlsQslzJT0s=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bTrRSFwe99fRk08slBjsV/tdeZcrKvf4Z0kEUNWr8wy3WrDrggeFUpsMgWHl8YkBTJ Ric0PwGC2bQB80RSIeVNVHwvvFpx9Z6DwXRMz4ZH1Yk9NLwf/bn+zrVgp1kxYVnpy0zX AGwRoVDhczXi0fv3gNuhsjhC98eoet5XqxWvw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19860.50935.146868.916017@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcvwVztsrSY9nFkxlkObuGhSCNJevA==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Nested Virtualization: tools
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 31/03/2011 19:24, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Christoph Egger writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Nested Virtualization:
> tools"):
>> tools: Add nestedhvm guest config option
> I don't have an objection to this.  The tools parts seem largely sane.
> However, I have two queries.
> Firstly, one for Christoph: is this patch safe to apply before the
> relevant hypervisor features, or will it break ?  If it will break
> then it should be applied later.
> Secondly, one for the Xen.org team in general: are we accepting new
> features in Xend ?  If not then I should drop the changes to xend from
> this patch.

If we are dropping xend in this release cycle, why would we bother taking
new features for it? In fact, why is xend even still in the tree? :-)

 -- Keir

> Ian.
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>