Hi Stephen,
On 03/23/2011 06:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi,
Just some simple comments.
Does having this patch first in the series break APM idle?
Thanks for reviewing.
Yes, I think removal of "pm_idle = default_idle" statement in
APM may have to be moved here.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:02:27 +0530 Trinabh Gupta<trinabh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index 8d12878..17b7101 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static inline void play_dead(void)
}
#endif
+extern void cpuidle_idle_call(void);
Put this declaration in a header file and include that header file here
and in the file that defines that function.
Ok, thanks
-Trinabh
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| 
Home