Re: [Xen-devel] keeping track of Intel vmcs

[Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 16/03/2011 02:58, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I always wonder about intel vmcs info tracking when i have to look at
> it. Following data structs are used to keep track of it:
> 
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct foreign_vmcs, foreign_vmcs)

Used to track if a CPU is currently running on non-current vcpu's vmcs. Only
used by dom0 and stubdoms really right now. But plausibly a HVM VCPU could
do this to another HVM VCPU in future. The logic is there for that right
now.

> v->arch.hvm_vmx.active_cpu;
> v->arch.hvm_vmx.active_list;

These are actually used, in cpu offline, for one thing (in the case of the
per-cpu vmcs list). Did you actually read the code?

> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vmcs_struct *, current_vmcs);

It is not true that current==v <=> current_vmcs==v's vmcs. Again, read the
code.

There are a few bits of state here it's true but they are used pretty much
entirely and straightforwardly in vmcs.c. You're not going to get much
simplification without making things slower and/or *less* obvious and/or
introducing subtle bugs. Leave alone.

 -- Keir

> It appears to me that it could be lot simpler. All we need to worry about is
> if a cpu needs to be launched or resumed. The rest can be concluded
> from existing information.  For example, current_vmcs and foreign_vmcs
> seems redundant. If current == v, then we can conclude current_vmcs is
> current, and forieng vmcs is not current! It seems all we need is
> unsetting launched in vmpclear.
> 
> Can someone from Intel tell me  what am I missing?
> 
> thanks
> Mukesh
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel