This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable test] 6413: regressions - FAIL

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable test] 6413: regressions - FAIL
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:00:29 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 03:02:37 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6xB6B/+e9KXbcDv4/kJu5N6bpKILFy0omCGLZy967QI=; b=oL/6ncgozSSws5paeGiDngyOnBhsjC3UVEvpn/M8MkcNjadmF6o2uIH4EfP8pl/em5 G8UWpbMp3pfwPsGEdFaXf9g4vwiYFVgjFwhAQThegzSoHctnQD63qj+iviTzy7ArXADH OBSzh1nhck/Dv14vbanhxk9WCwlaQYwWOoOJo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=N2lFxS5uSAgrkAJXpzhtPlFHxsM+pR7pSCj2lrOyUAvBqFUw4V0/ywLeUHBWPDg6mk +8zQOFwWq33UTxHl7Bg6knFxgvQaFlzxeDlBhhDxMZqlbem42rosLjC9E06aVW6lLFw9 XXO9J+0IuH6a/ofZVs17+TUrWLKggtBSJ/zMM=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D7F45E40200007800036882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acvi99BRLP00Czxtv0GIaDQW8Gnz0g==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable test] 6413: regressions - FAIL
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 15/03/2011 09:56, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> On 15.03.11 at 10:47, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 14.03.11 at 18:22, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Ian Jackson writes ("[xen-unstable test] 6413: regressions - FAIL"):
>>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
>>>>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win       5 xen-boot               fail REGR. vs. 6396
>>> Xen boot crash.  Lots of these ...
>> Yes, I can see my thinko is c/s 23033:84bacd800bf8  (too bad all
>> my test systems either have ARAT or no MSI support in their HPETs).
>> I'm sorry for that and will send a fix soon.
>> Jan
>>> Mar 13 23:29:31.091587 (XEN) Brought up 8 CPUs
>>> Mar 13 23:29:31.205401 (XEN) Testing NMI watchdog --- CPU#0 okay. CPU#1
>>> stuck. 
>>> CPU#2 stuck. CPU#3 stuck. CPU#4 stuck. CPU#5 stuck. CPU#6 s
>>> tuck. CPU#7 stuck.
> But I hope these aren't related, as I can't see how any recent
> change could have broken the watchdog NMI setup logic.

I think our NMI watchdog support is not working properly on all new CPUs,
and it's been that way for some time.

 -- Keir

> Jan
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Xen-devel mailing list