This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 12/14] xen: events: remove use of nr_irqs as uppe

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 12/14] xen: events: remove use of nr_irqs as upper bound on number of pirqs
From: Josip Rodin <joy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:41:29 +0100
Delivery-date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:42:30 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1299773295-348-12-git-send-email-ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:31:52AM +0100, joy wrote:
> Hi,
> I figure lockdep is going to tell you the same, but I happened to
> notice it myself:
> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/ianc/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=88d0448802e4720579e28ffc7e6db8652e378274
> @@ -769,7 +748,24 @@ out:
>  int xen_irq_from_pirq(unsigned pirq)
> [...]
> +       spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
> [...]
> +out:
> +       spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
> The latter one looks like it should be an unlock.

I just noticed that it's been pulled into
and mentioned in
So I'm sending it to the list (with adjusted Subject and In-Reply-To)
just in case.

     2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>