This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


[Xen-devel] Re: Features scheduled for the 2.6.39 merge window

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: Features scheduled for the 2.6.39 merge window
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:34:03 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:34:40 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1299841419.17339.1944.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eikelenboom IT services
References: <1198043929.20110311115713@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1299841419.17339.1944.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Ian,

Friday, March 11, 2011, 12:03:39 PM, you wrote:

> On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 10:57 +0000, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I have lost a bit of track on what (backend) features are scheduled for the 
>> 2.6.39 merge window.

> Konrad posted a state of the world for this last night, see the thread
> "2.6.39 merge window (git pulls and what is planned to go in)"

>> Of special interest for me:

> I'm afraid you are rather out of luck in that respect :-(

>> - blkback (tapdisk2?)

> Not planned for 2.6.39.

>> - netback

> Under review on the netdev list, might still make it.

>> - pciback

> Not planned for 2.6.39.

> FWIW blkback, netback and pciback all have relatively clean branches
> which could be pulled in for testing purposes though.

Hmmm looking at Konrad's git tree, the master tree seems to be just that in 
this case :-)
Will try it later this weekend.

> Ian.

Best regards,
 Sander                            mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xen-devel mailing list