This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] xen: events: Make last processed event chann

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] xen: events: Make last processed event channel a per-cpu variable.
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:30:07 +0000
Cc: James, Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:30:59 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D77E779.8070406@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <1299172198.6552.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1299172215-29470-2-git-send-email-ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> <20110309203216.GK8049@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1299703204.7176.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D77E779.8070406@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:47 +0000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 12:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:32 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:10:12PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> You cloned yourself?
> > The first is from the original linux-2.6.18-xen.hg commit.
> >
> > The second is from today as I forward the change upstream.
> >
> > I wasn't really sure what to do with the historical signed-off-by so I
> > decided to leave it, just as I would have done if it had been someone
> > else's.
> Since Citrix and Xensource are logically the same entity, just the
> Citrix one should be fine.

You are almost certainly right, but the xensource one is harmless and
accurately describes the provenance of the patch.

More importantly I don't think it's a big enough deal to be worth
respinning the series


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>