This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: do not rely on guest to respond when forc

On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 14:58 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > OK, fair enough. Honestly, I think my expectation for the detach case to
> > be more as I stated, but I don't feel strongly about it and it would
> > just add complexity to have it that way.
> That's the non--force'd way of doing it and AFAICT it behaves pretty
> much as you describe.

Except that the non-force way will bail if the guest doesn't respond and
leave everything as it is so that the device can still function.

How I described is try to play nice but before returning to caller -
make sure everything is removed.

Anyway, it's a minor point.


Xen-devel mailing list