This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] pvops: Make suspend work when CONFIG_SUSPEND

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:45 +0000, Frank Pan wrote:
>> > AFAIK the conclusion is that an approach which ensures both
>> > XEN_SAVE_RESTORE and SUSPEND (actually HIBERNATE after the above
>> > discussion) are enable when necessary (by making the former depend on
>> > the later) is what is going to be taken.
>> That's good. How long will it be committed on pvops trees?
> I don't know. Stefano, Rafael and Shriram are taking care of it AFAIK.
Well, from my side, I am waiting on Stefano & Rafael. The discussion seemed
to have ended with "lets wait for the code to settle", though there seemed to be
no consensus regarding the need to enable HIBERNATE for XEN_SAVE_RESTORE
to work.
 Someone suggested creating a new user visible hibernate symbol that would
solve this issue and make the main hibernate logic depend on this symbol rather
than the HIBERNATE symbol. I could certainly spin up a patch for that but nobody
seemed to have reached a conclusion.

As far as pulling the patches is concerned, IIRC, Rafael & Stefano
were talking "git"
jargon, as to who is going to take which patch.
Meanwhile, recently, Stefano said his branch went into linux-next
(my patches are not in that tree last I checked. :( ).

> Ian.
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>