|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support"):
> > The right way to implement fd* support is probably to create an "fd"
> > disk type, so that we can have frontends and backends for floppies and
> > support stubdoms.
>
> Yes.
>
> > However that would be obviously too much for this stage of the release.
> > This patch would solve the simple case but would introduce two fields in
> > the libxl idl that we know are wrong.
> >
> > I would rather implement this kind of simple fd support entirely in xl
> > using the extra field in libxl_device_model_info so that we don't
> > "corrupt" the idl.
>
> I think for 4.1 we will should to tell users who want floppy support
> to use device_model_args.
that would be yet another workaround to document
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Vincent Hanquez
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support,
Stefano Stabellini <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Jackson
|
|
|
|
|