|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remus: support both tap and tap2 style disk spec
On 2011-02-18, at 4:23 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Shriram Rajagopalan writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remus: support both tap
> and tap2 style disk specs"):
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Shriram Rajagopalan writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remus: support both tap
>>> and tap2 style disk specs"):
>>>> - if not disk.uname.startswith('tap:remus:') and not
>>>> disk.uname.startswith('tap:tapdisk:remus:'):
>>>> + disktype = re.match("tap2?:.*(remus.*)\|", disk.uname)
>>>> + if disktype == None:
>>>
>>> This seems quite a striking change. What is the tap2 remus syntax
>>> like ?
>>>
>> There is no change in remus syntax.
>> remus part of the disk spec just requires "remus:BackupHost:Port|" to
>> immediately follow major driver name. so,
>>
>> disk= tap2:remus:BackupHost:Port|aio:volname ...
>
> Your regexp would match
> tap2:aio:file:/path/containing/remus/and/with/a/pipe/symbol|
>
>> the problem is with the initial prefix "tap2:" string.
>> Which could be tap: or tap2: or tap:tapdisk or tap2:tapdisk based on
>> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/blktap2
>
> Yes, this is very unpleasant. But at the very least I think you
> should be somewhat more careful and at least expect the thing you eat
> at the front not to contain slashes.
>
>> Though as i noted in an earlier email, libxl doesnt accept tap2 while xend
>> accepts tap2.
>
> We have fixed that very recently - in the last day or two.
>
If that's the case, the patch could be really simple. Will send out another
patch soon.
Shriram
> Ian.
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|