Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85

[domiel forty-two <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Keir,

Thanks for the clarification.

D.

---

From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
To: domiel forty-two <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 18 February, 2011 6:08:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85

On 18/02/2011 02:44, "domiel forty-two" <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as
> suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?

Tim meant that the patches may be applied to xen-unstable after 4.1 is
branched from it. I.e., they are candidates for 4.2, not 4.1.

-- Keir

> TIA
>
>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000
> From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview
> To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>,    "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>    <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong,    Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote:
>> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen.
>> This is the seventh patch series.
>
> Thanks for this.  I've commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12
> (hap-on-hap) separately.  Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie
> for patches 1-8.
>
> Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1
> branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel