WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Comments on Xen bug 1732

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Haitao Shan <maillists.shan@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Comments on Xen bug 1732
From: "Li, Xin" <xin.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:34:31 +0800
Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
Acceptlanguage: zh-CN, en-US
Cc: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:35:36 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D55084E0200007800031673@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTi=K3+4Rbpuz512X4E1Pp-gDKVd2qwwVM7RQ+XMV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D46C4B1020000780002F74E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikgL3ned748XEssFtW=_S57rtf+Ma=J8HTCod=g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D47CCC9020000780002F9E3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikMcDf7AytvgaJky2Mz6F8dyj93CDpu-0TDPxV1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D55084E0200007800031673@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcvJylQjdhb7YrdCR52bi2PT9jMtpwADOEcw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: Comments on Xen bug 1732
> > Per my investigation, the process should be:
> > 1. Determine the corresponding PF of an given VF.
> >     This is already in Xen. But such kind of information is passed to Xen by
> > dom0. Again, do we trust dom0 for this?
> 
> I think trusting Dom0 is the right thing to do - it's being trusted in
> other places too.

Yes, dom0 is trusted!
Thanks!
-Xin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>