|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/microcode: support for microcode update
To: |
Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/microcode: support for microcode update in Xen dom0 |
From: |
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:48:48 -0200 |
Cc: |
|
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:12:14 -0800 |
Dkim-signature: |
v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=7r76JSnRDr3OWr5KwO7eVmUWUA0=; b=Dh/LDyi2ZqAefyMNy34/0ICM7i992/D+3jAODaT6+ZHvdslJ7ISzE+ajUYGtE+Mzg58c293zQ858s9xeCpO4SicuHam2w91bNRVwV22je1M4UAyu7DPL1VyyduxaGSCezNmA1H4yjO7xfkcyICaYcLeF6Y8NXV4hJHIx/KnVhlI= |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20110202095445.GA4761@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<cover.1296259339.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> <20110130113356.GA27967@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D461FB9.5050807@xxxxxxxx> <20110131070241.GA22071@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D46FC9F.6090309@xxxxxxxx> <20110131234131.GA16095@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D475099.1080004@xxxxxxxx> <20110201110026.GA4739@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D489348.90701@xxxxxxxx> <20110202095445.GA4761@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Why would you need that? You can safely assume that the ucode patch
> level on all cores across the system are identical - I've yet to see a
No. You can safely assume that the ucode patch level on all cores on a
package are identical, and that's it. Mixing processors with different
processor flags (and thus potentially different microcode) is not uncommon.
If it boots, it *will* be done, especially later in the product cycle, when
specific spare parts are harder to come by. Sometimes you can even mix
processors of different steppings.
> mixed silicon systems is a large pain in the ass and you're better off
> buying yourself a completely new system.
Well, I have some of them at work.
Mixed CPU steppings or processor flags happen when you expand the system
later to fill in processor packages (reasonably common), or when you replace
a CPU that is flaky (rare). This sort of mixing of different processors is
really common on older Xeon systems, and most of them need OS-assisted
microcode updates to get the latest microcode available.
I am not arguing anything about the way Xen decided to go about implementing
the feature, but they got the requirement "must pass through all the
microcodes without removing any" right. It exists.
> > However, even aside from that, it means exporting a pile of internal
> > details from microcode_amd and reusing them within microcode_xen. And
> > it requires that it be done again for each vendor.
>
> Why can't you load the appropriate, unmodified microcode_<vendor> module
> in dom0 and let it call the hypercall?
Or add a microcode_virtual passthrough device, for that matter. Wouldn't
that be much cleaner and more palatable?
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|