On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:41:40PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 16:18 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 25.01.11 at 16:41, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> It's derived from our kernel. Why do you ask, given that the initial
> > >> set of frightening messages come from the hypervisor?
> > >
> > > I haven't been doing bug-triaging very log; but IIUC IanJ's sense was
> > > that this failure only happened intermittently on XCP dom0 kernels
> > > (220.127.116.11-something), not on pvops or other kernels. I don't know
> > > much about the dom0-xen interface, so I was hoping someone who did
> > > could take a look.
> > The 2.6.27 kernel is dead as far as we're concerned. Does this
> > also happen with the 2.6.32 one? (And really I thought for .27
> > the project was still called XCI - does XCP have both .27 and
> > .32?)
> IIRC XCP 0.5 used the 2.6.27 tree while upcoming XCP 1.0 uses/will use
> the 2.6.32 tree.
> I agree that the testing should move to the 2.6.32 based XCP kernel.
I think also XCI (Citrix XenClient) uses 2.6.32 based dom0 kernel.
Xen-devel mailing list