 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 4607: regressions - FAIL
| To: | Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 4607: regressions - FAIL |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:30:53 +0000 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2011 04:31:55 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:user-agent:date :subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OhVct0fBd8k1O4eg55WOt/gVSK0JY31jLzLImX2Qhf4=; b=E/PT2GhYhlPXbhUQuhYBmt9sjSRmUg9xHpVviFJ4WnaVv6ZKTkTxm/SY5jG7ITyVSU lIdduGKhFTy7iuoEu8bpJfT5hlrXwykMqHWpeSEuZqibWfO4XDIyAC6wyuY//lx35axr /mfzo5PDYCJE6rhFS4PyhaCVdNRjH1+d50aRE= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=eQmwRzQ91KaLf1zTjf9fzvoP0Ez6cgK2NAt9VHe2gOr8/axoMOgW2obCGUoNV/hNIE X744zk3XYkyyeQ7lxYY70/zYGZkjXNqIiAvDiFEJMJMXis7/od9LdDpCSFqUBbW74ibb dnZ6CfVSVt4ZGMjNSIKOlcfcsN8n/6OyrKSyA= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <19756.19342.160120.151400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Acuxi2MEq/GPwuKJuUGdAN+n+OY8Iw== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 4607: regressions - FAIL |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117 |
On 11/01/2011 12:22, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 4607: regressions -
> FAIL"):
>> hardens my suspicion that some of the tests (the leak-check/check
>> ones in particular based on past observation) fail and succeed
>> randomly. Shouldn't either tests that cause regular random false
>> negatives be removed from the set (or at least made non-blocking),
>> or regular random false positives imply that more than one run
>> must succeed before an automatic push?
>
> You are indeed right. And the more tests we add the smaller the
> bearable intermittent failure probability is.
>
> I have changed the push gate logic so that it looks for tests of the
> same revision, in the way that you did by hand, and doesn't block the
> push if it finds that it passed in another run.
>
> This ought to get us pushes more often. It would still be nice to get
> rid of some of these race bugs :-).
Where are the races, do you think?
-- Keir
> Ian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: minios: eliminate compile warning - use of uninitialised variable, Gianni Tedesco |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] tailf for 'xm dmesg'?, Sander Eikelenboom |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 4607: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 4607: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
