Hmm, after looking it deeper, I summarize as the following
(1) It seems all the users of shr_lock, nominate/share/unshare, will check/modify p2m type.
- nominate: p2m_change_type()
- share: set_shared_p2m_entry()
- unshare: set_shared_p2m_entry() and p2m_change_type()
(2) The functions which call unshare()
- hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(): I don't see any p2m_lock holded
- p2m_tear_down(): hold p2m_lock
- gfn_to_mfn_unshare(): I don't see any p2m_lock holded
Thank for sharing the lock info.
I’ve go through the code too.
<![if !supportLists]>1. <![endif]>mem_sharing_unshare_page() has the routine called from gfn_to_mfn_unshare, which is called by gnttab_transfer
Since no bug report on grant_table right now, so I think this is safe for now
Also p2m_tear_down è mem_sharing_unshare_page() , its flag is MEM_SHARING_DESTROY_GFN, and won’t has the chance to
<![if !supportLists]>2. <![endif]>as for p2m_change_type(), I found in other place is it called lock free, so it is safe too
<![if !supportLists]>3. <![endif]>set_shared_p2m_entry() which call set_p2m_entry() is not in p2m_lock, and I found in other code set_p2m_entry is called in p2m_lock,
so here I think it is a problem
So I think at least set_p2m_entry should be put into p2m_lock.
I’ll do more investigation base on this.
One of the solution is to
(a) Simply replace shr_lock with p2m_lock.
(b) In unshare(), apply the following: if (!p2m_locked_by_me(p2m)) call p2m_lock, otherwise, don't lock it.
(c) p2m_change_type() and set_shared_p2m_entry() are pretty similar, we can merge the functionality into one function, which does NOT take p2m_lock, and keep the original p2m_change_type() unchanged.
Correct me if wrong.