WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology in xl

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology in xl
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:50:28 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:51:34 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:user-agent:date :subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RLhMrZGANDMFa6u+S6MEyNYnuf7v+AV7M+QOCOMZy9w=; b=HiBKP4bnDewSk5CLokzffJ8pyHLWlZ83WmqaNt+tpP/ZugPTTCc50AfilsqHP1+EtA FqKA4NcED/6JiO3J7IvsddM2JUyRLXZCHF2lPLkegAgsor7lAEOkptvu50caW981O/e3 PnsuxrJR4fPc6vJXLx3cfPP8X+7s1CUaqL8PM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=JKJ7Mug7WBd1osYGw/7aavMjZMVVA3fnGHxh8EhIbkAqKDWI5WBRTsFKzJNv3KNU0K xG04zS6V+r5hcrW9/3Xy2hfKRFkKOVUyIYoffW+RKRVmbGAngZpBrNuR96IUm1vgZPQG QlsTNgomTX+CCJxK3uWj8gA6CzqY3R0DfGzqw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19723.41436.419700.193126@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcueEuPhdSqaEEwUeEONaqWkfDR+vQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology in xl
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117
On 17/12/2010 17:46, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology
> in xl"):
>> any reason you didn't apply my series up to now?
>> Did I miss any objection?
> 
> No, there is no problem with your series.  However, our tests are
> failing a lot and I wanted to wait until we have a test pass and a
> push before dumping a lot more stuff into xen-unstable.
> 
> So I'm holding off on your series as well as a few others.
> 
> Keir, it would be nice if we could try to restrict stuff going into
> xen-unstable to obvious bugfixes, for a bit.
> 
> I suggest that our rule for the end-of-December freeze should be that
> patches which were posted in their final form or something very like
> it by (say) Christmas Eve should go into 4.1, even if we have held off
> actually committing them until early January.
> 
> Alternatively I can throw everything in now and try to fix it up later
> but it does make it harder to pin down what went wrong when things
> break.

That sounds okay. I have nothing in my queue to be applied now anyway.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel