WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] bogus gfn - mfn - gfn - mfn checks in guest_physmap_add_

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] bogus gfn - mfn - gfn - mfn checks in guest_physmap_add_entry
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:27:10 +0100
Cc: Patrick Colp <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 23:36:04 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1290756440; l=480; s=domk; d=aepfle.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:Cc:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=h43GOUo/GCX/EWNiRcw78g95oUs=; b=mk8sfarnM94caZzx/Eo13uOFZAlXiheitUA8d2Kz44B76SeUUnMi+kqCbiD8ZtKD2EO PsDa8BUN/Rk8XO1XF21HtastMMg2+KVCpC2gk0V12JM5qnnM5h85v5LYbQlJSwwz51/6T lwkRlJvRNlxojRod59aWpJWrQFJDqqZ+Pe4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C91493F3.B22B%keir@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20101125205346.GA26720@xxxxxxxxx> <C91493F3.B22B%keir@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Thu, Nov 25, Keir Fraser wrote:

> This patch is still RFC I assume? Quite apart from anything else, the patch
> will need to be made against xen-unstable. At this point, given the need for
> the waitqueue infrastructure to get xenpaging working reliably, I don't
> think fixing xenpaging for stable 4.0.x upstream is going to fly. It's going
> to be tough enough getting it stable for 4.1.

Sure, I will finally port all these changes to xen-unstable, today.

Olaf

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel