|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] OOM problems
> I found today that tapdisk2 (at least on the latest 4.0-testing/unstable
> and latest pv_ops) is causing data corruption for Windows guests; I can
> see this by copying a few thousand files to another folder inside the
> guest, totalling a bit more than a GB, then running "fc" to check for
> differences (I tried with and without GPLPV). That's obviously a huge
> deal in production (and an even bigger deal than crashes), so in the
> short term, I may have to switch back to the uglier, crashier file:
> setup. I've been trying to find a workaround for the corruption all day
> without much luck.
That's disturbing. It might be worth trying to drop the number of VCPUs in dom0
to 1 and then try to repro.
BTW: for production use I'd currently be strongly inclined to use the XCP
2.6.32 kernel.
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, Daniel Stodden
- RE: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, John Weekes
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, John Weekes
- RE: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, John Weekes
- RE: [Xen-devel] OOM problems,
Ian Pratt <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, John Weekes
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, John Weekes
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, John Weekes
- RE: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, Stefano Stabellini
Re: [Xen-devel] OOM problems, George Shuklin
|
|
|
|
|