Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 2521: all pass

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Olaf Hering writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 2521: all pass"):
> Are you sure?
> My copy looks like this, and the patch still applies.
> 
> 686         # Convert scheduling parameters to vcpus_params
> 687         if 'vcpus_params' not in cfg:
> 688             cfg['vcpus_params'] = {}
> 689         if not cfg["vcpus_params"].has_key("weight"):
> 690             cfg["vcpus_params"]["weight"] = \
> 691                 int(sxp.child_value(sxp_cfg, "cpu_weight", 256))
> 692         if not cfg["vcpus_params"].has_key("cap"):
> 693             cfg["vcpus_params"]["cap"] = \
> 694                 int(sxp.child_value(sxp_cfg, "cpu_cap", 0))

Oh, I see you're right.  I misread the subject of the mailing list
article.

I've applied it now, sorry.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel