On 10/26/2010 07:30 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 05:23:32PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> Removes nr_irq sized array allocation at start of day.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/xen/events.c | 50
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
>> index 94055ea..9b58505 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
>> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
>> */
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_mapping_update_lock);
>>
>> +static LIST_HEAD(xen_irq_list_head);
>> +
>> /* IRQ <-> VIRQ mapping. */
>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int [NR_VIRQS], virq_to_irq) = {[0 ... NR_VIRQS-1] =
>> -1};
>>
>> @@ -85,6 +87,7 @@ enum xen_irq_type {
>> */
>> struct irq_info
>> {
>> + struct list_head list;
>> enum xen_irq_type type; /* type */
>> unsigned short evtchn; /* event channel */
>> unsigned short cpu; /* cpu bound */
>> @@ -103,7 +106,6 @@ struct irq_info
>> #define PIRQ_NEEDS_EOI (1 << 0)
>> #define PIRQ_SHAREABLE (1 << 1)
>>
>> -static struct irq_info *irq_info;
>> static int *pirq_to_irq;
>> static int nr_pirqs;
>>
>> @@ -132,7 +134,7 @@ static struct irq_chip xen_pirq_chip;
>> /* Get info for IRQ */
>> static struct irq_info *info_for_irq(unsigned irq)
>> {
>> - return &irq_info[irq];
>> + return get_irq_data(irq);
>> }
>>
>> /* Constructors for packed IRQ information. */
>> @@ -315,7 +317,7 @@ static void bind_evtchn_to_cpu(unsigned int chn,
>> unsigned int cpu)
>> __clear_bit(chn, cpu_evtchn_mask(cpu_from_irq(irq)));
>> __set_bit(chn, cpu_evtchn_mask(cpu));
>>
>> - irq_info[irq].cpu = cpu;
>> + info_for_irq(irq)->cpu = cpu;
>> }
>>
>> static void init_evtchn_cpu_bindings(void)
>> @@ -428,6 +430,21 @@ static int find_unbound_pirq(void)
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> +static void xen_irq_init(unsigned irq)
>> +{
>> + struct irq_info *info;
>> +
>> + info = kmalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (info == NULL)
>> + panic("Unable to allocate metadata for IRQ%d\n", irq);
> There is a bunch of panic around allocating IRQs. There is one earlier
> in xen_irq_alloc too, and I was wondering - would it make sense to
> perhaps print an error to both the hypervisor and the kernel and
> just return -1 as an IRQ and let the kernel continue with its normal
> failure path?
>
> I am thinking just in terms of making the system still be able to
> work even if parts of it are busted, instead of just crashing the system.
>
> Not sure which philosophy is domiant in the Linux kernel?
Normally to print something and struggle on, rather than crash over
every little thing. There's been a general tendency to convert BUG into
WARN, for example.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home