|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Domain 0 stop response on frequently reboot VMS
|
To: |
<daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] Domain 0 stop response on frequently reboot VMS |
|
From: |
MaoXiaoyun <tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:54:41 +0800 |
|
Cc: |
xen devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:55:14 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Importance: |
Normal |
|
In-reply-to: |
<1288084192.2221.175.camel@ramone> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<BLU157-w4633FF2011F6D0F8408CAEDA570@xxxxxxx>,,,, <C8DE0E35.261CD%keir@xxxxxxx>, , , <BLU157-w8114EC5EB660DA26E51B9DA580@xxxxxxx>, , , <1287436670.23170.43.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, , <BLU157-w385D9EE38F5058B8F364C2DA400@xxxxxxx>, , <1287899811.4575.32.camel@ramone>, <BLU157-w38033DF3C81294A533C0ADA420@xxxxxxx>, <1288084192.2221.175.camel@ramone> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thanks, Daniel.
I think I can handle it myself.
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Domain 0 stop response on frequently reboot VMS
> From: daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:09:52 -0700
>
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 04:16 -0400, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
> >
> > Well, where can I start if I want to maintain the current
> > kernel(2.6.31), and only update the blktap2?
> > As I go throught the git branch of
> > xen/dom0/backend/blktap2<http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/xen/dom0/backend/blktap2>, I found wait_queue.c is removed.
> > It looks like blktap2 has changed a lot, right?
> > So I am courious the difference between the new and the old one.
> > Could you share some brief explainations, that would be very
> > helpful.
> > Thanks in advance.
>
> For brief explanati
ons but nothing particular I can only refer you to
> the commit messages. Because there have been plenty of them. :)
>
> They're all still backward compatible as far as the userspace ABI for
> older tapdisk2s goes. My recommendation would be replacing that whole
> blktap/ directory, because I can't support you with more than that.
>
> If you choose to do so: You might need some patches fixing request queue
> accesses, there might be slight differences to 2.6.32, that's a bit of a
> moving target sometimes. But it's not a big deal.
>
> Daniel
>
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
Home