WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux kernel summit 2010 topic: "Xen, in or out" (Greg K

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Linux kernel summit 2010 topic: "Xen, in or out" (Greg KH)
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:23:30 +0200
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:25:19 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C8E32CF9.26467%keir@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eikelenboom IT services
References: <686531435.20101019111929@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C8E32CF9.26467%keir@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tuesday, October 19, 2010, 12:09:45 PM, you wrote:

> On 19/10/2010 10:19, "Sander Eikelenboom" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> Iirc Konrad wrote he's going there..
>>> Sounds like some Xen people definitely should be there :)
>> 
>>> -- Pasi
>> 
>> 
>> Perhaps someone more into the hypervisor side of things (Keir?) could be wise
>> too ?

> Attendance at the kernel summit is by invitation only.

Ahh i see that complicates it a bit :-)
Although an email to Greg KH if there could be any need from responses from 
within Xen on the points discussed could lead to something ?
On the other hand perhaps the kernel folks should first agree on what they 
think ...

I don't know if Jeremy goes ? He seems to be on the "potential invitation list".


>  -- Keir

>> I could imagine a discussion could go to how much Xen hypervisor wise has
>> to/could change to make the kernel changes more clean and less intrusive, as
>> that seems to be the old discussion that keeps popping up from time to time.
>> It also seems people are hesitant to get the patches in mainline because 
>> there
>> doesn't seems to be much of an outline of what will come after the first
>> perhaps less intrusive patches and fear there could be some crap later that 
>> is
>> less easy to refuse since a part is allready in.
>> Any willingness and vision on that part could reduce the hesitation to 
>> include
>> Xen patches in mainline i think.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Sander
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel





-- 
Best regards,
 Sander                            mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel