This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handlin

It should.

"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 10/15/2010 05:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>  On 10/12/2010 01:29 PM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> Commit-ID:  77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
>>> Gitweb:     
>>> http://git.kernel.org/tip/77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
>>> Author:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:37:10 +0200
>>> Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CommitDate: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:53:44 +0200
>>> x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling
>>> There seems to be more cleanups possible, but that's left to the xen
>>> experts :)
>> This causes the kernel to fail to boot under Xen.  The WARN_ON(res !=
>> irq) triggers and nobody is very happy about the results.
>Of course the really interesting question is whether this sparse irq
>rework allows us to hang our extra per-irq information of the irq_data
>structure now, rather than having to maintain all these auxiliary arrays?
>    J

Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon any lack of formatting.

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>