WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-API] XCP: dom0 scalability

To: "'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-API] XCP: dom0 scalability
From: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:38:50 +0400
Delivery-date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 10:39:51 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=J1tC9qCzUkzG7w5EHtlOiId4fsfGHUACbOcB0aRrNoo=; b=Cc15cVwa5NjPMdvPkIHJZk/Kkxlp2gNodhUV+Y5Ohl6uz9bbWq9jkHCMMYCJanA9IW 6giQahJnflAIzSpttV9eeRfc6wEXCahYQ3iYF04no7HpZ/wIqasiLJ2akUQ9GhP5AMVK 0AYkI042fTXzBmFUc5hKz6vKvug6NZx2EYoFM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=vha9LBJ0uGxPdZ+gCjWrbWs5EbFYIYpcUR2nVioKLyFQPnzpjSYyTkIchYBwkq424g xn3OIhNGT1pZ3Hc6V476RSURP/OqR6e3RkiB7zQymIYwq+CYuJexlPuEolrAGNQnS8i4 GNVwnD5/Gs7Q8gIGCJp+A+Nxt1SGzW7JVQmR8=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <81A73678E76EA642801C8F2E4823AD219331853A47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <81A73678E76EA642801C8F2E4823AD219331853A47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This seems rational, but what about overhead? Every domain will require
own kernel with memory (main concern about memory).

I think, first step shall be splitting xapi to few separate daemons.

В Птн, 08/10/2010 в 20:54 +0100, Dave Scott пишет:
> Hi,
> 
> I've added a draft of a doc called "the dom0 capacity crunch" to the wiki:
> 
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XCP_Overview?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=xcp_dom0_capacity_crunch.pdf
> 
> The doc contains a proposal for dealing with ever-increasing dom0 load, 
> primarily by moving the load out of dom0 (stubdoms, helper domains etc) and, 
> where still necessary, tweaking the number of dom0 vcpus. I think this is 
> becoming pretty important and we'll need to work on this asap.
> 
> Comments are welcome.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xen-api mailing list
> xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>