[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-API] XCP: dom0 scalability

To:	"'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-API] XCP: dom0 scalability
From:	George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:38:50 +0400
Delivery-date:	Sat, 09 Oct 2010 10:39:51 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=J1tC9qCzUkzG7w5EHtlOiId4fsfGHUACbOcB0aRrNoo=; b=Cc15cVwa5NjPMdvPkIHJZk/Kkxlp2gNodhUV+Y5Ohl6uz9bbWq9jkHCMMYCJanA9IW 6giQahJnflAIzSpttV9eeRfc6wEXCahYQ3iYF04no7HpZ/wIqasiLJ2akUQ9GhP5AMVK 0AYkI042fTXzBmFUc5hKz6vKvug6NZx2EYoFM=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=vha9LBJ0uGxPdZ+gCjWrbWs5EbFYIYpcUR2nVioKLyFQPnzpjSYyTkIchYBwkq424g xn3OIhNGT1pZ3Hc6V476RSURP/OqR6e3RkiB7zQymIYwq+CYuJexlPuEolrAGNQnS8i4 GNVwnD5/Gs7Q8gIGCJp+A+Nxt1SGzW7JVQmR8=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<81A73678E76EA642801C8F2E4823AD219331853A47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<81A73678E76EA642801C8F2E4823AD219331853A47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This seems rational, but what about overhead? Every domain will require
own kernel with memory (main concern about memory).

I think, first step shall be splitting xapi to few separate daemons.

В Птн, 08/10/2010 в 20:54 +0100, Dave Scott пишет:
> Hi,
> 
> I've added a draft of a doc called "the dom0 capacity crunch" to the wiki:
> 
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XCP_Overview?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=xcp_dom0_capacity_crunch.pdf
> 
> The doc contains a proposal for dealing with ever-increasing dom0 load, 
> primarily by moving the load out of dom0 (stubdoms, helper domains etc) and, 
> where still necessary, tweaking the number of dom0 vcpus. I think this is 
> becoming pretty important and we'll need to work on this asap.
> 
> Comments are welcome.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xen-api mailing list
> xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-API] XCP: dom0 scalability