 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Configuration of nestedhvm
| To: | "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Configuration of nestedhvm |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:12:04 +0100 |
| Cc: | Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:13:03 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:user-agent:date :subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4OoEB4fKdeuxfuFkFddX6/d3DEoxZuz78TaNOWYV/34=; b=pb1bOeIHTMPWs6MUpSvKTt0l8Mg1koyDwGetEAsQSsaMul+YODDR7j34BUCfNv3OM0 pjASsUhICkAPEI5z3myFNq8/qab42VnlMgd7NHmFeCc+H+BGu8xUCJyjEnr9biOWV2jS sTcwLvx7J4ESeE69qvMhB41nl5JnmAwS5B0oc= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=T9nQ1fEwiGeLFkpAHaN2MesGNdXhuo+504AWcKZHgkah+8ojj1sAPMmtmYqtSBMs6S xLh9NHX8CXOzpVWNFgXDo53UNX46LZl2zoC7c9vb8WfPFnb3NdgqLaOyFA48q0LXr5wE Yx4F5ApH/3RkPiawRHK1byd8vnfmYlavpn2Mw= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B22DBEA36C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Actmf7Fhjj9F1X8UQAiSevQQTVQBcAAIcuFwAAWnxlY= |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] Configuration of nestedhvm |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.26.0.100708 |
On 08/10/2010 05:34, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nested virtualization usage model is emerging, however we must guarantee it > won't impact the performance of simple virtualization. > This patch add an boot parameter for nested virtualization, which is disabled > by default for now. What's the point when a per-domain config option is going to be implemented? You can then simply not configure nestedhvm for a domain you want to test without that capability? I suppose it makes your second patch make a bit more sense than it would in total isolation. I think patch#2 probably makes sense, but it should wait for the patch that actually implements the per-domain config option, and properly implements is_nestedhvm(), before going in. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] .* entries in official release source tarballs, Jan Beulich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][QEMU] ATI graphics VBIOS passthru support, Kay, Allen M |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Configuration of nestedhvm, Dong, Eddie |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] Configuration of nestedhvm, Dong, Eddie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
