| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/7] acpi: use indirect call to register gsi in d
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 10:00 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Peter,
> > I sent this patch a while back as part of the "PV on HVM: receive
> > interrupts as xen events" series (that it is based upon Konrad's
> > pcifront series, he sent another version to the list yesterday).
> >
> > Do you think that this is a reasonble approach?
> >
> > If you want to give a look at the whole series you can find it here:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/30/170
> >
> > everything else is Xen specific stuff.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
>
> On the surface it seems reasonable.
>
> Thomas Gleixner has been working on greatly revamping a bunch of the x86
> interrupt code, and this might interact with his stuff, so it would be
> good if he could comment on it.
>
> [tglx: what they're apparently working on is to redirect APIC interrupts
> to Xen event channels so they don't have to interact with the simulated
> memory-mapped APIC. It's "paravirtualization light".]
I'm not touching acpi code. So that should be ok.
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home