Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] Bugfix for tools/blktap/lib/xs_api.c (co

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] Bugfix for tools/blktap/lib/xs_api.c (convert_dev_name_to_num)
From:	George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:43:24 +0400
Delivery-date:	Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:44:43 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zKnXVLFCcBcjXD4eJTOi+37MTXT7xQzLsL3FjGnnJ1M=; b=CoISYQdXQS6PuGxHtaStNJKP46R+k8b/gAAIC9RIsGfmFY+7MCm/iqa0g27GAVJuWC nbhyNLvZO6bpCbAVKanAiS3yws6Z+ZrVE1dRxM5lLXNlHN9/cldhAsSoV386HV5qkMLE IfxzdTRhBz1IgvNqyfvF89/XHJ77h7DKNYiBA=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Uk63E3UmPBY+kCTPb7mwJL6bcU4QODSdFk3hI90OpLNq76iLZFDT9yAO7KXE2P8b9Z 5rA637C0QlnauJ4qhJrQSjwC6g7tIEwAUfQWlvElo62nQhq0imbpf2VJJ/VJgAhqKiGF S0HrXY85biGZRkQFpXPAPafFAOE7/u7hIyjmk=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<19612.50226.108495.118725@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<1285275796.3845.1275.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19612.50226.108495.118725@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Well, I do not insist, but could you explain reason of using
construction like *p++; or using atoi to arbitrary string?

В Птн, 24/09/2010 в 16:30 +0100, Ian Jackson пишет:
> George Shuklin writes ("[Xen-devel] [patch] Bugfix for 
> tools/blktap/lib/xs_api.c (convert_dev_name_to_num)"):
> > I rewrote function convert_dev_name_to_num from
> > tools/blktap/lib/xs_api.c
> 
> Thanks but I'm afraid I don't think your patch is either a good idea
> or suitable.
> 
> Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [patch] Bugfix for tools/blktap/lib/xs_api.c (convert_dev_name_to_num), George Shuklin Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] Bugfix for tools/blktap/lib/xs_api.c (convert_dev_name_to_num), Ian Jackson Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] Bugfix for tools/blktap/lib/xs_api.c (convert_dev_name_to_num), George Shuklin <=

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] Bugfix for tools/blktap/lib/xs_api.c (convert_de