WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/13] Nested Virtualization: CRn & paged real mo

To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/13] Nested Virtualization: CRn & paged real mode
From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:42:57 +0200
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:00:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100908151133.GC23487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <201009011700.45203.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> <20100908151133.GC23487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.10
On Wednesday 08 September 2010 17:11:33 Tim Deegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > diff -r 0199b689a2d0 -r e0eae5b67977 xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/hvm/support.h>
> >  #include <asm/hvm/cacheattr.h>
> >  #include <asm/hvm/trace.h>
> > +#include <asm/hvm/nestedhvm.h>
> >  #include <asm/mtrr.h>
> >  #include <asm/apic.h>
> >  #include <public/sched.h>
> > @@ -1109,9 +1110,13 @@ int hvm_set_cr0(unsigned long value)
> >      /* ET is reserved and should be always be 1. */
> >      value |= X86_CR0_ET;
> >
> > -    if ( (value & (X86_CR0_PE | X86_CR0_PG)) == X86_CR0_PG )
> > +    if ( !nestedhvm_vmentry_emulate(v) &&
> > +         (value & (X86_CR0_PE | X86_CR0_PG)) == X86_CR0_PG )
> >          goto gpf;
>
> The change above makes perfect sense: nested SVM guests should be
> allowed to enter paged real mode.
>
> But I don't understand either of the changes below.  Can you explain why
> the cache control bits get special treatment?

Your question confuses me related to this mail:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-08/msg00432.html

Please explain what you want to know.

Christoph


> Tim.
>
> > +    if ( nestedhvm_vcpu_in_guestmode(v) )
> > +        value &= ~(X86_CR0_CD | X86_CR0_NW);
> > +
> >      if ( (value & X86_CR0_PG) && !(old_value & X86_CR0_PG) )
> >      {
> >          if ( v->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_efer & EFER_LME )
> > @@ -1163,7 +1168,7 @@ int hvm_set_cr0(unsigned long value)
> >          }
> >      }
> >
> > -    if ( has_arch_mmios(v->domain) )
> > +    if ( !nestedhvm_vmentry_emulate(v) && has_arch_mmios(v->domain) )
> >      {
> >          if ( (value & X86_CR0_CD) && !(value & X86_CR0_NW) )
> >          {



-- 
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel